reader must concentrate on the theological message being presented. James Montgomery points out that even though Belshazzar did in fact rule Babylon (thus vindicating Daniel as a historical source), much in the stories still runs contrary to what is known of ancient Babylon and Persia.1 He observes that a kosher Jew as chief magician would be unworkable; Nebuchadnezzar worshipping Daniel’s God over against his own stretches credulity. Instead of events compatible with known history, Daniel presents